The Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps, already notorious for its unpredictable weather and challenging layout, became the center of renewed debate in the Formula 1 paddock when Max Verstappen publicly criticized the FIA’s decision to use a rolling start during the race restart. The Dutch driver, known for his unfiltered commentary and fierce competitive spirit, did not hold back in expressing his dissatisfaction with the race director’s judgment, calling it an “overly cautious” move that detracted from the integrity and excitement of the race.

The incident unfolded after a red flag was issued due to heavy rainfall and poor visibility on Lap 17. Once conditions improved, race officials opted for a rolling start rather than a traditional standing start. This meant that cars resumed the race behind the safety car and were not allowed to battle for position immediately at the restart, a decision the FIA justified as necessary for driver safety.
However, Max Verstappen, who was leading the race at that point, expressed frustration with the call. “We are racing drivers. We know the risks. Spa is always tricky, but that’s what makes it special. To always default to the safest option in the name of caution takes away from what this sport is all about,” Verstappen said in his post-race interview. He added, “A standing start would have brought excitement and given fans what they came for. We can’t keep avoiding every challenge the moment it appears.”
Verstappen’s comments sparked immediate discussion among fans and experts, many of whom shared his sentiments on social media, suggesting that Formula 1 is becoming overly sanitized in its approach to risk. Others, however, defended the FIA’s decision, citing the fatal accident of young driver Dilano van ’t Hoff in a lower-tier series at Spa earlier in the year as a reminder of the track’s dangers in wet conditions.
What came as a surprise to many was the speed of the FIA’s response. Within just ten minutes of Verstappen’s interview airing, FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem issued a formal statement. “We understand and respect Max’s competitive instincts and his passion for the sport. However, our foremost responsibility remains the safety of all drivers on the grid. The decision to proceed with a rolling start was based on real-time assessments of the track surface and visibility, not speculation,” Ben Sulayem said.
He further explained that the FIA’s race directors and safety delegates work in consultation with team principals and data analysts to ensure that restarts are conducted under conditions that minimize the risk of collisions, especially on circuits like Spa where aquaplaning can occur suddenly and with severe consequences.
The rapid and personal nature of the FIA chief’s response highlights the sensitivity surrounding safety decisions in Formula 1. It also underlines the growing influence of top drivers like Verstappen, whose words carry weight not just with fans but with the sport’s leadership.
While the debate continues, it is clear that Formula 1 is grappling with a difficult balancing act—maintaining the thrill and danger that has long defined the sport while upholding modern safety standards that protect its participants. Verstappen’s criticism may have been controversial, but it has once again opened a necessary conversation about the direction in which the sport is heading.
As the season progresses, attention will remain focused not just on the battle for the championship but also on how the FIA navigates this tightrope between spectacle and security—especially when the world’s top drivers are unafraid to speak out.