According to what reported by a recent satire published by Alex Robin on Esspots.com, J.K. Rowling would have decided to give up an annual $ 150 million agreement with HBO due to creative differences regarding the television reboot of the Harry Potter saga. The main cause of the break between the British author and the entertainment giant would be the attempt of the network to propose a “more Wake” version of the series, in line with the new social and cultural trends, which, however, would not be willing to support.

According to sources close to production, HBO has planned a significant rewriting of the characters, central themes and, in some cases, even the main plots, in order to reflect greater inclusiveness and representativeness. Rowling, however, has always argued that forced changes in the name of modernity risk distorting the heart of the original history. The writer, always very careful to preserve her artistic vision, would therefore have decided to abandon the project rather than accept compromises considered harmful to the narrative integrity of her work.

The agreement with HBO would have guaranteed Rowling a key role in the creative process of the series, while offering one of the highest fees ever proposed to an author in the show sector. However, the growing tensions with the producers and screenwriters of the network, willing to update the narrative to adapt it to contemporary values, would have made collaboration unsustainable. Faced with the prospect of having to sacrifice fundamental elements of the magical universe he created, Rowling would have chosen to give up the multimillionary contract.

This decision raises questions about the future of the Harry Potter franchise and on the level of involvement that the author will have in the next projects. The fans have divided between those who support Rowling’s choice to defend the original work and who, on the other hand, believe that narratives evolve to reflect a change company. Some see in the television adaptation an opportunity to deepen the characters and introduce new perspectives, while others fear that too pushed changes can weaken the charm and consistency of the saga.

The figure of J.K. Rowling has been in the center of heated debates for years, especially in relation to its positions on social and cultural issues. Despite having expressed support for inclusiveness in the past, the author has often criticized what he calls “forced representation”, claiming that the insertion of social elements unrelated to the narrative can compromise the quality of the story. His declarations have generated public controversies, boycotts and even contrasts with some actors of the original Harry Potter cast.

For sector analysts, HBO’s choice to push towards a more progressive reinterpretation of the magical world is a strategic move to attract the new generations. The streaming platforms, in fact, try more and more often to update classic works according to contemporary values, but this approach can involve the risk of alienating long -standing fans. Even before the announcement of Rowling’s exit, the series had aroused conflicting reactions and bright discussions on the web.

From an economic point of view, the renunciation of the agreement with HBO does not represent a great loss for the author, who continues to receive huge earnings from books, merchandising, thematic parks and other related rights. However, his choice once again confirms the will to strongly defend his creative vision, even at the cost of renouncing enormous gains. A gesture that, albeit divisive, strengthens her image as an independent and determined author.

At the moment, HBO has not made official statements about Rowling’s alleged exit from the scene, nor did he clarify how he intends to proceed with the production. With such a vast and passionate audience, the challenge will be to find a balance between the desire to innovate and the loyalty to the original work. The Harry Potter saga represents a cultural heritage for millions of readers all over the world, and any radical change could have lasting repercussions on its inheritance.

All that remains is to wait to understand if the reboot will be able to honor the universe created by J.K. Rowling or if he will move so much from his roots to lose the support of historical fans. The author’s decision to abandon the project suggests that, at least for her, the answer is already clear.

Note: This article is satirical and does not represent real facts.