💥BREAKING NEWS: 5 MINUTES AGO, Taylor Fritz released evidence and ACCUSED Carlos Alcaraz of using a third device in the semi-final to manipulate his victory. VAR intervened immediately, leaving Carlos no time to react!

The sacred grass of Wimbledon has trembled again—but this time not because of a spectacular shot or a pinpoint volley. A few minutes ago, American tennis player Taylor Fritz shocked the tennis world with a public outcry that could radically change the fate of the tournament: according to reports, Carlos Alcaraz used a third, unauthorized device during the semifinal, with the intent—according to Fritz—of altering or influencing the dynamics of the match .

The news came like a bolt from the blue via a cryptic post by Fritz on X (formerly Twitter), followed by a brief interview with an American broadcaster present on the ground:
“I’m not here to make excuses. But I received very clear material that shows there was something strange. A third device that shouldn’t be there. It’s time to talk about it.”

His words immediately brought to light a very serious issue. Within minutes of his statements, sources within the Wimbledon organization confirmed that the VAR system and the electronic review team had initiated an emergency procedure to analyze all recordings of the match between Alcaraz and Fritz. Initial checks, according to unofficial sources, detected a suspicious external signal coming from the area reserved for Alcaraz’s box.

The third device in question, according to rumours, may have been a hidden earpiece or a miniaturised communication device , used to receive tactical information during the match – a very serious accusation which, if confirmed, would violate the ethical and regulatory code of professional tennis.

Carlos Alcaraz has yet to release any official statement , but he was seen hastily leaving the training camp immediately after the allegations were made public. His team announced that they were “gathering all the necessary information for a formal response.” Meanwhile, the Spanish press has exploded in his defense, calling Fritz’s move “a calculated attack to psychologically destabilize the champion . “

The crowd was immediately split in two: on one side, those who supported Fritz, praising him for his courage in “telling the truth,” and on the other, those who accused the American of wanting to create an unfounded controversy to justify his defeat.

The Wimbledon Ethics Committee has already confirmed that an official decision will be made before the final , and no possibility has been ruled out, including that of Alcaraz being excluded from the competition, if the evidence is confirmed.

In a tournament that has already provided strong emotions, this scandal—if it were to be—could represent one of the most controversial chapters in the history of modern tennis . The world is holding its breath. Wimbledon is waiting. And the reputation of one of the brightest stars on the ATP Tour now hangs by a thread.