The recent controversy in Wimbledon has sacudido to the tennis fans since the CEO of the tournament, in an exclusive interview, has already made it clear that Jannik Sinner has not been included in the list of invited players who have not been vinculado with the drug. Según declaraciones de la directora, el historial del joven del tenista Italiano planta serias dudas sobre su inclusion in the event most prestigioso del tenis.

“Jannik Sinner did not enter his planes for this year he had to pass,” declared the CEO, referring to an incident that occurred several years ago in which he questioned the involvement of the judge in drug practices. This comment provoked some reactions in the world of tennis, especially among the Italian players, who were outraged by those who considered it unfair for an error of the past.

Sin embargo, the most impactful response to current number 1 of the world, Novak Djokovic, who was immediately slain in Sinner’s defense. On one of his career paths, Djokovic showed his abandonment with the Wimbledon posture and called him lost and stuck in his present. “Eso es del pasado, y allos cometemos eres. El tenis es un deporte que debe basarse en el presente. Si Jannik ha aprendido de sus errors, deberíamos darle an oportunidad. As we are humanos, debemos ser capaces de perdonar si es posible”, affirmed Djokovic.

Djokovic’s words surprised the fans, who did not hope that Serbio would have a firm position in defense of his team. Much is united at the cause, arguing that the athletes should be judged by their actual behavior and not by the fact that they hicieron in the pasado, especially when they are most likely to be arrepentidos and compromised with the better.

This conflict between the declarations of the CEO of Wimbledon and Djokovic’s apoyo has Sinner desatado a conversation more amply sobre el perdón en el deporte y la forma en que los jugadores deben ser tratados después de un error. However, fans should observe how this controversy arises and if Sinner ultimately receives an invitation to Wimbledon or if the position of the CEO prevails.

The controversy is also evident in the differences of opinion within the community of tennis, a deporte that, a little, is seen in disputes over justice, the etica and the sanction to the athletes who made mistakes on the way to glory.